MEDIART
  • Home
  • About
  • BLOG
  • Praxis Greece
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • BLOG
  • Praxis Greece
  • Contact
  MEDIART

MEDIART

2023

Iran’s War on Women: A Never-Ending Story

27/11/2022

Comments

 
Since the murder of Mahsa Amini in September 2022, protests for women's rights in Iran have grown louder. Yet the oppression of and violence against women has a much longer history.
Picture
The murder of Mahsa Amini by Iranian morality police nine weeks ago was just another, but a sensational example of the violence the Islamic Republic perpetrates against women – not only physical violence, but also social, legal and economic violence. The Islamic Republic's constitution guarantees the equality of all citizens before the law, but in practice the state continues to discriminate against women. Four articles of the constitution deal with issues relevant to women, but all provide ample room for discrimination under Islamic law. Neither the Constitution nor the Personal Status Act protect women's rights.

Head Covering Prescribed by Law
While Iran today is a male-dominated country, before the 1979 revolution the state did not impose a uniform dress code on women; women were free to choose whether to veil or not.  Within weeks of the revolution, however, the Islamic hijab became compulsory. But most women, especially those of the younger generation, rejected this attempt by the state to dictate how they should dress. When they took to the streets of Tehran to protest, they were attacked by vigilantes and the police did nothing to stop the attackers.
Since then, the women have ignored the dress code in small and increasingly brazen ways, and they have paid for it. Under the law of retribution, adultery is punishable by stoning and violating the hijab by seventy lashes. Many young and middle-aged women received this punishment – a blatant example of how the state uses physical violence against women.
The arrest and death of Mahsa Amini on 13 September is one of the latest cases of violence under these laws.

Inheritance Law and Women’s Treatment in Family
Iranian family and inheritance laws generally favour men over women.
Men can have up to four wives and enter into an unlimited number of "temporary marriages", while women can have only one husband. A female virgin of any age who wishes to marry needs permission from her father or grandfather or a court. Men can divorce their wives for any reason or no reason, while women have the right to divorce only under certain conditions. Muslim women, unlike Muslim men, are not allowed to marry non-Muslims.
In divorce cases, Iranian law usually grants custody of children over the age of seven to the father, while women are usually granted custody of children until they are seven years old. 
Women need their husband's permission to obtain a passport and travel abroad. Husbands are legally allowed to determine where the family lives and to prevent their wives from practising certain professions.
According to the law, the widow of a childless man is only entitled to a quarter of his estate after his death. If he has children, the widow's share is reduced to one-eighth. A widower, on the other hand, inherits half of his childless wife's estate and a quarter if she has children. If a man had several wives, the normal widow's inheritance is divided equally among them.
Each son of a deceased person inherits twice as much as each daughter.

Social Gender Segregation
Under Iranian law, women and men must sit in separate areas on public transport, at public weddings and in university classes, attend separate schools and use separate entrances to some airports, universities and public buildings. Women are generally not allowed to attend men's sporting events – such as football matches – in public stadiums.

Denial of Economic, Political, and Cultural Opportunities
Iran ranks second worst in "Economic Participation and Opportunities" for women among the 146 countries surveyed in the World Economic Forum's (WEF) Global Gender Gap Report 2022 – only ahead of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The percentage of women in Iran's labour force has remained in the mid-teens for years, while the official unemployment rate for women is around 20 per cent, about twice that of men.
The Iranian regime prohibits women from working in some government offices, including the judicial organisation of the armed forces. Iranian law gives husbands control over their wives' work opportunities. In some cases, husbands are legally allowed to exclude their wives from work, and some employers hire women only with their husbands' consent.
Iranian law offers women insufficient protection against sexual harassment in the workplace. The law also does not prohibit discrimination in hiring on the basis of sex.
The regime also bans women from nearly 80 fields of study, from engineering, computer science and nuclear physics to economics and English literature.

Among the 146 countries covered by the WEF's Global Gender Gap Report 2022, Iran ranks fifth worst in terms of women's "political participation".
In practice, women are not allowed to serve in the top ranks of Iran's leadership, including as supreme leader or as a member of the Guardian Council. The Guardian Council continues to bar women from registering as presidential candidates, including all 40 who planned to run in the 2021 elections. Women are also barred from serving as judges.
There are no women in President Raisi's cabinet, not even as deputy ministers. Only one of Iran's 12 vice presidents, who have less power than cabinet ministers, is a woman. Only 16 women sit in Iran's 290-member parliament, and the Guardian Council bars thousands of candidates from participating in parliamentary elections.

The government frequently censors publications critical of the Islamic Republic and removes material concerning women's rights. The regime also censors or bans films that it believes would spread subversive ideas about women's rights.

Rape 
Marital rape is legal in Iran. Iranian law also de facto discourages most victims of non-marital rape from reporting to the authorities. Rape victims who come forward can be charged with offences such as adultery, "indecency" or "immoral behaviour". Accused rapists can only be convicted if several witnesses testify. According to reports, about 80 per cent of rape cases go unreported.
Zahra Navidpour, a woman who had accused Salman Khodadadi, a former IRGC commander and former chairman of the parliamentary social committee, of rape, was found dead in her home under mysterious circumstances in January 2019. Also in 2019, former Iranian vice-president and former mayor of Tehran Mohammad Ali Najafi confessed to the murder of one of his wives and was convicted. However, her family waived the death penalty.
In June 2018, international media reported on protests related to the gang rape of at least 41 women and girls in the city of Iranshahr, a predominantly Baloch province. The regime reportedly tried to deny the cases, in which some of the perpetrators were said to have had links to Iranian security forces.
The regime has downplayed the frequency of the rapes. In 2011, the current President Ebrahim Raisi, then Deputy Chief Justice, claimed, "In our society today, women are safer than in Western society. We have the safest situation in the world, and this is not refuted by corrupt people who violate Sharia law, as such cases are quickly investigated."

Domestic Violence and “Honour Killings”
Domestic violence is not a criminal offence under Iranian law. Penalties for murder by domestic violence or "honour killings" are more lenient than those for other homicides. For example, men convicted of murdering their daughters are sentenced to only three to ten years in prison, rather than the usual death penalty.
The Iranian parliament has still not passed a bill that was drafted more than nine years ago to criminalise gender-based violence. After the bill had languished in parliament for more than five years, the Rouhani government approved it in May 2017 and forwarded it to the judiciary for consideration, but Iran's chief justice postponed the bill for two more years.
Finally, in September 2019, the judiciary approved the law after it had been heavily amended and weakened. The Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) criticised the revised draft law for "failing to provide effective and sufficient safeguards to protect women from violence, and in many cases promoting and supporting stereotypical, discriminatory and sexist views towards women."
The government does not release official statistics on honour killings, but academic research shows that an estimated 375 to 450 honour killings are committed each year. In 2020, 14-year-old Romina Ashrafi was beheaded by her father for eloping with her 29-year-old boyfriend. Fathers who kill their children face a maximum of 10 years in prison; mothers who do so face the death penalty. Due to nationwide outrage over the beheading, Iran's Guardian Council approved a law criminalising emotional or physical child abuse or abandonment, but did not change the 10-year maximum sentence for a father who kills his daughter. In August 2020, Romina Ashrafi's father was sentenced to nine years in prison.

Judicial Punishment
According to the Iranian Penal Code, the age of criminal responsibility for women is only nine lunar years, while for men it is 15 lunar years. Women are punished more severely than men for several offences, including adultery, which carries the death penalty. Most death sentences by stoning for adultery are imposed on women.
Iranian family law also increases the risk of women being prosecuted for adultery. Husbands do not have to cite grounds for divorce, while wives are only entitled to divorce if their husbands sign appropriate contracts, cannot provide for their families, have otherwise violated their marriage contracts, or are impotent, mentally ill or drug addicts.

Reaction to Women’s Rights Activists
Iranian authorities continue to harass, arrest and imprison women's rights activists, sometimes accusing them of national security crimes such as espionage and collaborating with foreign powers to overthrow the regime. The government bans some women's rights activists from travelling abroad.
Since 2018, the regime has detained dozens of people for protesting against mandatory head coverings. The activists have been charged with "inciting prostitution and corruption", among other offences. One of the activists, Shaparak Shajarizadeh, was sentenced to two years in prison and an 18-year suspended sentence after a long detention in which she was reportedly tortured and beaten and held in solitary confinement. Shajarizadeh, who fled Iran after her conviction, claims she was told she would serve her entire 20-year sentence if she continued to engage. In August 2019, a revolutionary court sentenced another hijab protester, Saba Kordafshari, to 24 years in prison.
In April 2019, authorities arrested Yasaman Aryani, her mother Monireh Arabshahi and Mojgan Keshavarz after they posted an International Women's Day video showing her without a headscarf on the metro. In August, a revolutionary court sentenced the three to 16, 16 and 23 years in prison respectively for "spreading propaganda against the system" and "inciting corruption and prostitution". An appeals court upheld their sentences in February 2020.

A striking feature of the current widespread and ongoing protests in Iran, which are pushing the country to the brink of revolution, is that they were sparked by violence against a woman. It was women who took to the streets with the slogan "Women, Life, Freedom". The regime bizarrely treats men and women equally when it comes to the brutal suppression of these protests. Women, like their male counterparts, have paid dearly for demanding an end to violence, the rule of law rather than religion, equality before the law and economic opportunities for all, not just the men in power. So far, at least 27 women have been killed and a large number of women arrested. According to CNN, women and young girls, as well as men, are being physically abused and raped – another horror story of what they face in prison just for peacefully protesting on the city streets.
Alma Deten
Alma is a German volunteer involved in the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.
Comments

Misinformation controls women’s bodies

25/11/2022

Comments

 
On the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, we look back to one of the most shocking news this year. The overturn of Roe v. Wade in the US is an attack on women’s rights.
Picture
On June 24th, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, a landmark recognizing the constitutional right to abortion. Millions of women worldwide raised their voices in anger in the following days: "My body, my choice". From newspaper covers to posts on social media, the spotlight was on the topic of abortion.

In the next weeks after the Supreme Court's decision, there were several debates about whether abortion should be legal and accessible or criminalized by law. So far, misinformation controls the narrative. Where to stand towards abortion, depends on beliefs instead of facts.

Amnesty International, a global movement that campaigns to end the abuse of human rights, provides facts about abortion on its website. The need for abortion is common and happens for several reasons, but access to a safe and legal procedure is far from guaranteed.

Each year, there are 25 million unsafe abortions. Criminalizing abortion doesn't stop abortion, just makes it more dangerous for women. Unsafe abortions are the third leading cause of maternal deaths. Almost every death and injury from unsafe abortion is preventable. A safe abortion performed by professionals is safer than childbirth.

"There are violent, even deadly laws. Not only do they control women’s bodies but they force women to seek clandestine, unsafe abortions, with serious risks for woman’s health, sometimes putting her in danger."

The rollback of abortion rights in the USA has been mirrored by many other nations globally, where the rise of pro-life movements coincides with radical politics. Abortion bans don’t affect only US citizens, there are 24 countries where is completely prohibited, including El Salvador, the Philippines, Senegal, and Honduras. And more than 50 countries and regions permit abortions only when the woman’s health is at risk. Is estimated that 90 million women of reproductive age live in countries where abortion altogether is illegal.

One of the most-heard pro-life arguments is "just don’t have sex if you don’t want a baby". However, girls and women live in a world where sometimes having sex is not their choice. In the US, a sexual assault occurs every 68 seconds. 1 in every 6 women was a victim of an attempted or completed rape. And is estimated that 63,000 children per year were victims of sexual abuse. According to The World Health Organization, nearly one-third of women worldwide have been subjected to sexual violence in their lifetime.

On the 24 of June, UN human rights experts denounced the Supreme Court decision. "The right of a woman to make autonomous decisions about her own body and reproductive functions is at the very core of her fundamental right to equality, non-discrimination, health, and privacy."

Movements pro-life and laws that ban abortion attack women’s liberty. Women are forced to give birth against their will. Criminalizing abortion is a form of discrimination, that further fuels stigma. Is a form of violence against women with physical and mental consequences. Access to abortion is a matter of human rights. 
Sara Sousa
Sara is a Portuguese volunteer involved in the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.
Comments

Childhood: The Price to Pass the Border

20/11/2022

Comments

 
“Inclusion, For Every Child” is the UN theme for this year's World Children's Day. With a special focus on dislocated children who face discrimination and exclusion.
Picture
One-third of the refugees and migrants who have arrived in Europe are children. There are more than 22,500 refugee and migrant children forsaken in Greece, Cyprus, and the Balkans. In an endless wait to be allowed to move forward. Going back to their home countries isn’t an option, and they struggle to fit into their host communities.

The number of people forced to leave their homes has grown year after year over the past decade. Is at the highest level since it began to be recorded. Despite some signs of progress, the speed and scale of forced displacement are beyond solutions for refugees. Families cross the border in hopes of finding a safe place for their children to grow. Sometimes safe, but rarely inclusive.

"There are far more reasons that push children to leave their homes and fewer pull factors that lure them to Europe. But for those who do aim to come to Europe, the allure is the chance to further their education, find respect for their rights and get ahead in life. Once they reach Europe, their expectations are sadly shattered."
– Afshan Khan, Regional Director for UNICEF in Europe and Central Asia.

From time to time, shocking news comes out about this reality, however, they are quickly forgotten. This is the everyday life of thousands of children, who don’t have the privilege of just forgetting.

Children on the move risk everything for a better life, for a glimpse of a future. Their childhood gets lost in the sea they cross and the roads they walk. They are vulnerable to abuse and other forms of violence during and after their journeys. It is estimated that more than one child dies every day along the Central Mediterranean route from North Africa to Italy.

But do the obstacles imposed on these children start and end on the journey to Europe? The answer is no. They dream of a country where they can start a new life. But since the moment they cross the border, these children are labeled “refugees”. This simple word can exclude someone from society.

"We're now refugees. People don't like us. No one is loyal, everyone lies. I was a kid before. I am older now. I know more."
– Rawan, aged 12, flee from Aleppo in Syria

Regarding education, although all children have a fundamental right to basic education, stereotypes and judgment may lead to discrimination, prejudice, and bullying. Refugee and migrant children are seen as different, and schools are not prepared enough to promote multiculturalism and openness to diversity.

Refugee children feel excluded from the host community. Physical appearance, religious, linguistic, and cultural differences are some of the factors that contribute to feeding the preconceived ideas that lead to discrimination.

The mental health state of these children is often ignored. They develop trauma and stress related to specific events while in their country of origin or during displacement. They need psychological support and a safe environment to recover from what they have witnessed, however, this is rarely available to them.

What has to change? Countless things. Sometimes, the immensity of what is yet to be changed for a more equal world for refugees, makes us think that it is impossible or that it is not worth it. But it's worth it. Recognizing that the problem exists is the first step. Demand more responses from governments in this regard. Try to be informed by listening to their voices. And day after day, try to fight the stereotypes that live inside each one of us.

On the 20th of November, let’s celebrate World Children’s Day by thinking about all those that don’t feel included and how to change this reality.
Sara Sousa
Sara is a Portuguese volunteer involved in the World Children's Day.
Comments

Valeria Mithatenet: the component that creates Hierarchy and imbalance

18/11/2022

Comments

 
The uncertainty of international arranged marriages drives director Michal Vinik's provocative drama Valeria Is Getting Married. A Ukrainian bride's efforts to successfully marry off her sister to an Israeli man backfire – with devastating consequences.
Picture
India, China, Pakistan, Japan, Iran, Iraq, Indonesia, Bangladesh and South Korea – these are the countries with the most frequently listed arranged marriages. Surprisingly, since you almost never hear about them, more than half of all marriages worldwide are arranged leading to over 20 million such relations today. This is also how Valeria, protagonist of Michal Vinik’s film Valeria Is Getting Married, finds herself – not difficult to recognise from the title – before such a wedding. In her drama, Vinik creates a poignant story about the component that creates hierarchy or imbalance, hiding at the heart of most relationships.

Since her arranged marriage to the broker Michael, Christina (Lena Fraifeld), a Ukrainian woman, has been living in Israel the past few years. The couple have convinced her younger sister Valeria (
Dasha Tvoronovich) to a similar arrangement demonstrating their comfortable lifestyle and their solid relationship. Until their first meeting, Valeria and her soon-to-be fiancé, the eager Eitan, have only spoken online. Then, when she travels to meet him , things turn out differently than expected.

Set over the course of one day, the film focuses on the unplanned consequences for everyone involved after Valeria starts being overwhelmed by the situation and hesitates. Eitan is ashamed of being rejected by someone from whom he expected gratitude, and his family is angry and argumentative, Michael is frustrated as he may have to return the considerable sum he earned from the introduction. Suddenly, Christina is responsible for her sister's behaviour, which reveals her precarious position as a recent immigrant and an equal in her own marriage.

The film was shot before Russia's invasion of Ukraine on 24 February, so the war does not play a role in the story. Instead, the focus is on broader issues such as gender inequality and economic inequality in relationships, as well as the specific problem of marriages arranged online.


Writer-director Michal Vinik creates a poignant story about the component that creates hierarchy or imbalance in most relationships. She, as in previous works, proves herself one of cinema’s sharpest observers of gender, inequality and politics. Both entertaining and informative, Valeria Is Getting Married  deconstructs widely spread prejudices and preconceptions about Ukrainian women, which have become much more visible now as so many women are fleeing the war.

"My interest mostly has to do with how these [arranged] relationships serve as a mirror for all committed relationships between any two people, whether married or not. The arrangement between a Ukrainian bride and an Israeli groom may fall on the extreme end of the relationship scale, but at the core of many relationships, there is a component that creates a hierarchy or imbalance."
– Michal Vinik

Born in Haifa (Israel), 1976, Michal Vinik graduated from the Film and Television Department at Tel-Aviv University as a scriptwriter and director in the MFA program. She has written scripts for several television series and co-created her own (Who Gave you a License, together with Daniella Doron and Talya Lavie).

Without slipping into the melodramatic, Valeria Is Getting Married is carried by strong performances and an intelligent and sensitive script that dispels stereotypes and acknowledges the difficult choices that have brought the sisters here.

Definitely a big recommendation – especially
because of Vinik's entertaining and accesible way to address this important subject.
Alma Deten
Alma is a German volunteer attending the Thessaloniki International Film Festival.
Comments

Money-making misogyny: where does tolerance end?

16/11/2022

Comments

 
Misogynistic, racist, homophobic statements on the net are justified with the freedom of speech. Should we tolerate intolerance on the basis of freedom of speech?
Picture
“It’s bang out the machete, boom in her face and grip her by the neck. Shut up bitch,” – these are the words of internet star Andrew Tate in a video while acting out how he’d attack a woman if she accused him of cheating. He says women belong in the home, can’t drive, and are a man’s property. The British-American kickboyer also thinks rape victims must “bear responsibility” for their attacks and dates women aged 18-19 because he can “make an imprint” on them, according to videos posted online. Still a big platform is given to him on the internet, oftenly justified with the freedom of expression.

That this does not correspond to any liberal ideas is clear. But where does tolerance end – and with what justification?

35-year-old Andrew Tate – who poses with guns and fast cars – talks about hitting and choking women, trashing their belongings and stopping them from going out. In an online video, he calls an ex-girlfriend who accused him of hitting her – an allegation he denies – a “dumb hoe”.
Tate’s views have been described as extreme misogyny by domestic abuse charities, capable of radicalising men and boys to commit harm offline.

But this man is not a marginal personality spreading his ideas in a fringe corner of the dark web. In fact, he is one of the most famous people on the video platform TikTok, where videos of him have been watched 11 billion times. In a matter of months, he has become one of the most talked about people in the world – in July of this year, there were more Google searches for his name than for Donald Trump or Kim Kardashian. In August so far alone, clips tagged with his name have been watched more than a billion times.
Offering his fans a recipe for making money, “escaping the matrix” and pulling girls, Tate entertains – in his own online university – 127,000 members who pay £39 a month, many of them men and boys from the UK and US.
Supporters say his talking style is an antidote to so-called cancel culture and demand consideration of Tate's right to freedom of expression in response to criticism.

As a cornerstone of many current democracies, freedom of expression is enshrined in numerous constitutions. This refers to the principle that every individual can express their opinions and ideas without the threat of legal consequences or censorship. The set of guarantees include the freedom of speech, of the press, of association, of assembly and petition. But what if these personal philosophies harbour hatred against others or aim to suppress their freedoms? Restricting this very right of people who use it to restrict it from others would seem to contradict the principle of free speech altogether.
At a certain point, there will inevitably be ideas that do not conform to socially accepted norms. Extreme ideologies can pose a real danger to society and, more often, to certain minorities. Hate speech directed against ethnic and religious minorities, for example, emphasises disapproval of their otherness and often threatens violence. While people have the right to think and express intolerant ideas, others are free to disagree. The paradox of tolerance raises the question at what point intolerant ideas can no longer be tolerated and whether the violation of individual rights in the name of tolerance is acceptable.

The philosopher Karl Popper described the paradox of tolerance as the seemingly counterintuitive idea that "society must be intolerant of intolerance in order to maintain a tolerant society". If a so-called tolerant society allows intolerant philosophies to exist, it is essentially no longer tolerant.
Popper first formulated the paradox of tolerance in his 1945 work The Open Society and Its Enemies. Popper claims that a society that tolerates intolerant ideas succumbs to the forces of the intolerant, which are inherently dangerous. This destroys the notion of a perfectly tolerant society. Society should first combat intolerance with rational arguments and civil public discourse, but when all else fails, Popper suggests that the tolerant reserve the right to suppress intolerant opinions.

The paradox of tolerance raises several questions about individual freedoms and the power of government to control them. While freedom of speech is an essential component of democracy, extremist groups use it to spread hate speech and promote dangerous programmes. When the government restricts freedom, it moves away from democracy and transforms into an authoritarian style. Of course, the consequences of moving too far towards one end of the tolerance-intolerance spectrum are not as bad as they may seem, as cases of total extremism in one direction are very unlikely. Nevertheless, it is important to consider the paradox of tolerance in a modern society where communication is so pervasive. In assessing whether or not intolerance should be tolerated, we need to determine where our values lie – in favour of complete freedom of speech or in favour of limiting harmful dialogue.

“I inflict, I expect, absolute loyalty from my woman, I ain’t having my chicks talking to other dudes, liking other dudes. My chicks don’t go to the club without me, they are at home.”
– Andrew Tate

But although much of the content appears to violate TikTok's rules, which explicitly prohibit misogyny and copycat accounts, the platform seems to have done little to limit Tate's distribution or block the accounts responsible. Instead, it catapulted him into the mainstream by allowing clips of him to go viral and actively promoting them to young users.
The NSPCC’s Hannah Ruschen, a policy officer, added: “Viewing such material at a young age can shape a child’s experiences and attitudes, resulting in further harm to women and girls in and out of school and online.”
When asked, TikTok said it took misogyny seriously and was actively investigating whether accounts posting content of Tate were breaching its rules.

It is precisely when online platforms fail to find a moral solution that it is our task to reflect on the society in which we live and want to live.
Because: freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences and unrestricted tolerance is not real tolerance.

Alma Deten
Alma is a German volunteer involved in the International Day for Tolerance.
Comments

Science needs the responsibility and tolerance of all of us.

9/11/2022

Comments

 
Picture
Scientists. Most people think about professionals who do dangerous experiments on living and breathing individuals that could endanger the whole human race in their basement. But that is not true.

World Science Day is celebrated on 10th of November worldwide. This day illustrates the significant role of science in society and the need to engage the wider public in debates on emerging scientific issues.
It is essential to realize that scientists are generally speaking actually one of the most responsible types of people and not how you would imagine them due to negatively displaying movies or TV shows. In reality, they have to follow specific rules strictly to not facilitate the violation of human rights or endanger the future human life on earth. They are even trying to find solutions for the irresponsible actions of other human beings. A clear example for this would be climate change. Most of our society is not aware about the negative footprint they leave on our planet and scientists are there to find solutions for the negative impact we have.
This new way of thinking, to prevent any more harm or compensate, can be adapted to a lot of areas and working fields. Take, for instance, agriculture: scientists are already genetically modifying plants to make them more resistant to the symptoms of climate change. This means science gives us the opportunity to make plants more heat/cold resistant, less in need of water and less susceptible to pests. Definitely needed in a time in which droughts and other natural catastrophes are more common than ever.

Developing and making the populations of the world more equal is only possible if we all collaborate and share our scientific knowledge. In order to support this message, the World Science day was established on the 10th November 2002. This year is the 20th anniversary of the World Science Day for Peace and Development and the last two years, which are characterized by the covid Virus, have shown once again how important it is to share our knowledge. Only that way people from all around the world could be vaccinated this fast and the states could prevent any more harm by collaborating internationally.

This point makes obvious why Science Day also enforces Peace: science brings people together by letting them put their differences aside to work as equals on the same issue for a greater outcome. In order to keep the World Science Day for Peace and Development so special and realize its purpose of Peace, the UNESCO even establishes cooperations between scientists living in regions marred by conflict - one example being the UNESCO-supported creation of the Israeli-Palestinian Science Organization (IPSO).
Joana Khalo
Joana is a German volunteer involved in the World Science Day for Peace and Development.
Comments

    Categories

    All
    Antifascism Day
    Christmas Holidays
    CLAP!
    Coming Together - Bringing Down Barriers
    COP21
    Democracy Day
    Film Festival
    Food Day
    Halloween
    Human Rights Day
    Imag'in
    International Day
    Peace Day
    Podcast
    Refugee Experience
    Stereo Typical
    Tourism Day
    UrbanArtVentures
    Video
    World-aids-day

    Archives

    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from Jorge Franganillo